The United States' New G.E. Rules Affect Global Trade
January 17, 2023

In the US, the public has not been informed of G.E changes. Let's compare other countries' current procedures for debating G.E

The newly developed rules that have been made in the US are affecting our trading partner's attitude toward trading with us. Additionally, the US is leading the push for countries to loosen trading laws with little success. Here are some news examples I found interesting that you won't easily find in the US news.


In the EU, there is a current fight to soften the rules on G.E. however, in Europe, the citizens are much more informed, and the Government is much more transparent. If you read the current proposed bill and the media coverage, you can gain an accurate perspective of the recklessness of the United states current G.E rules.


Link to UK Parliament Genetic Technology (Precision Breeding) Bill

gene-edited tomato

Link to Mexico news; Mexico to Proceed with GMO Corn Ban“Pressure on Biden administration continues to come for them to launch a complaint under the USMCA over Mexico’s crop provisions that U.S. lawmakers and U.S. corn growers fear could lead to them losing an important market.”

gene-edited tomato

Link to article- How and why gene editing faces fewer global regulations than GMOs

Top Producing Countries of Gene-Edited (GE) Crops


1. United States

The largest grower of GMOs is the United States (37.6% of all acreage in 2019). In March 2018, the USDA issued a statement, “Under its biotechnology regulations, USDA does not regulate or have any plans to regulate plants that could otherwise have been developed through traditional breeding techniques as long as they are not plant pests or developed using plant pests."


They've also mentioned that new techniques and methods used by plant breeders, such as genome editing, have increasingly expanded legacy plant breeding resources and tools because they can create innovative plant traits faster and more accurate, potentially shaving off decades of time to bring new plant varieties to the growers in the agriculture industry.


2. Brazil

3. Argentina

Brazil is the second largest grower of GMOs, Argentina is the third, and Paraguay is the sixth. They all adopted a policy that regulates gene-edited food and crops as conventional plants unless they contain foreign DNA.


4. Canada

The fourth largest grower of GMO crops in Canada. Health Canada passed new guidelines relating to GE crops, which will deregulate them.


Canada “will no longer regulate or conduct safety assessments for foods produced from genetically edited plants unless they contain foreign DNA...There’s a consensus that the use of gene editing technologies doesn’t present any unique safety concerns compared to other, more conventional methods of plant breeding. As such, Health Canada should regulate gene-edited products of plant breeding in the same manner as all other products of plant breeding.”



5. India

India, coming in at #5, all of which GE crops appear to be Bt cotton. India's new regulations outline that genome-edited plants (or organisms) with no foreign DNA will likely not face regulations to the same biosafety standards as GMO crops, and they will have no oversight or be regulated any longer by the Genetic Engineered Appraisal Committee.


source: Genetic Literacy Project


Learn more here
A screenshot of a federal register webpage displaying the title of an agency information collection notice.
By Josh Wilson April 4, 2026
Public Comment Open on USDA Genetic Engineering Regulations 2026
A wooden gavel resting on top of a small stack of US dollar bills, set against a background of an American flag.
By Josh Wilson March 24, 2026
biotech endangered species act rule change advances in house
Three light-brown meerkat figurines with attentive expressions, huddled together against a textured gray rock background.
By Josh Wilson December 23, 2025
Our Response to USFWS Request for Comment
Frustrated person
By Josh Wilson December 3, 2025
Boost Hope and Transparency: Bureau of Land Management Receives "Support Letter" w/ Video in Mohave County
A researcher in a lab coat and safety goggles holds a small green plant sprig in a blue-gloved hand.
By Josh Wilson November 14, 2025
Our response to BLM Rescission of Conservation and Landscape Health Rule
A close-up of a hand using a pen to sign a legal contract on white paper.
By Josh Wilson November 13, 2025
Our Request to Investigate Under House Rule X
Logos for the USDA and APHIS, featuring blue text and green graphic elements representing fields.
By Josh Wilson August 1, 2025
Response to APHIS on G.E. Chestnut Deregulation Submitted on July 21, 2025
A vibrant orange butterfly with black markings resting on a bright red zinnia flower against a soft, blurred background.
By Josh Wilson May 6, 2025
Response to U.S. Fish and Wildlife Services May 2, 2025
A parchment scroll featuring the words
By Josh Wilson January 7, 2025
By and For The People is a Citizen-led Effort to Ensure Transparency and Accountability in Public Land Decisions and Federal Spending
An open notebook with handwritten text and a pair of round glasses, beside a white mug of coffee on a wooden table.
By Josh Wilson January 7, 2025
I have spoken with many lawmakers, senators, and congressmen. 100% of the people I have contacted are unaware of these federal efforts and are surprised by them.
More Posts